Conventional and rotary techniques in the preparation of dental root canals [Técnicas convencionales y rotatorias en la preparación de conductos odontológicos]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62574/5884k369Keywords:
endodontics, regenerative endodontics, root canal therapyAbstract
Objective: to analyze conventional and rotary techniques in the preparation of dental canals. Method: systematic population-based review of 15 scientific articles. Results and Conclusion: The studies reviewed show that rotary techniques are more effective than manual techniques in the cleaning and preparation of root canals, since they offer greater precision, control and capacity to eliminate microorganisms such as Enterococcus faecalis and the smear layer. These techniques allow better preservation of the tooth structure, reduce the expulsion of debris towards the apex and speed up the working time, especially when combined with ultrasonic irrigation or GentleWave.
Downloads
References
Usta SN, Solana C, Ruiz-Linares M, et al. Effectiveness of conservative instrumentation in root canal disinfection. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(6):3181-3188. doi:10.1007/s00784-023-04929-z
Hora BS, Singh KK, Pawar M, Kumar A, Arya A, Oak A. Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris and Irrigant using Three Different Rotary Systems with Conventional Irrigation Methods - An In vitro Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023;15(Suppl 2):S1086-S1088. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_210_23
Shaikh SM, Goswami M. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Root Canal Preparation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using CBCT. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(4):250-255. doi:10.17796/1053-4628-42.4.2
Eren İ, Sezer B. Comparison of the Effects of WaveOne Gold, TruNatomy, and Conventional Hand Files on Remaining Dentin Volume in the Coronal Part of the Root and Preparation Efficiency in Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2023;49(8):1027-1034. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2023.05.020
Basmaci F, Oztan MD, Kiyan M. Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E. faecalis within root canals. Int Endod J. 2013;46(9):823-830. doi:10.1111/iej.12067
Balaji S, Jeevanandan G, Ravindran V, Assiry AA, Vishwanathaiah S, Maganur PC. Comparative evaluation of volumetric changes following rotary and hand files' canal preparation of primary maxillary canine: an in vitro nano-CT analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024;25(2):227-235. doi:10.1007/s40368-024-00877-8
Afkhami F, Sadegh M, Sooratgar A, Amirmoezi M. Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push-out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022;8(1):464-469. doi:10.1002/cre2.500
Bhattacharjee A, Singh RK, Patil RK, et al. Comparative assessment of cleaning efficacy of two exclusive paediatric rotary files in root canals of primary teeth: An in vitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2024;34(4):474-484. doi:10.1111/ipd.13148
Chudasama KD, Chokshi S, Sanghvi Z, Patel N, Vaidya N, Chhaya D. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of ProTaper & Mtwo Rotary Retreatment System and Conventional Hand H-files for Removal of Gutta-percha from Root Canal - A Stereomicroscopic Study. Indian J Dent Res. 2024;35(2):206-210. doi:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_145_23
Velardi JP, Alquria TA, Alfirdous RA, Griffin IL, Tordik PA, Martinho FC. Efficacy of GentleWave System and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation with Minimally Invasive and Conventional Instrumentation Technique against Enterococcus faecalis Lipoteichoic Acid in Infected Root Canals. J Endod. 2022;48(6):768-774. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2022.01.021
Velardi JP, Alquria TA, Alfirdous RA, et al. Comparison of GentleWave system and passive ultrasonic irrigation with minimally invasive and conventional instrumentation against LPS in infected root canals. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4894. Published 2022 Mar 22. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08835-4
Castro-Núnez GM, Dos Santos JREV, Zaniboni JF, Escalante-Otárola WG, Porto TS, Kuga MC. Effect of mechanical cleaning protocols in the fiber post space on the adhesive interface between universal adhesive and root dentin. Microsc Res Tech. 2022;85(6):2131-2139. doi:10.1002/jemt.24071
Jafari Semnani S, Moghadam KN, Jafari Z, Chiniforush N. Comparative effects of the conventional, ultrasonic, and laser-activated irrigation on penetration depth of three photosensitizers in the root canal system. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2024;49:104286. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104286
Stănuși AȘ, Popa DL, Ionescu M, et al. Analysis of Temperatures Generated during Conventional Laser Irradiation of Root Canals-A Finite Element Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(10):1757. Published 2023 May 16. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13101757
Andreani Y, Gad BT, Cocks TC, et al. Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM). Aust Endod J. 2021;47(2):143-149. doi:10.1111/aej.12482
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Copyright (c) 2024 By the authors. This article is open access and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
