Comparison between filled and unfilled methacrylate resins in fixed temporary prostheses. Systematic review [Comparación entre resinas de metacrilato rellenas y no rellenas en prótesis provisionales fijas. Revisión sistemática]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62574/m8v6dz92Keywords:
resins synthetic, dental alloys, dental materialsAbstract
Objective: to compare filled and unfilled methacrylate resins in fixed provisional prostheses. Method: systematic review of 20 scientific articles. Results and Conclusion: By adding fillers and polymers to methacrylate resins, a significant improvement in their physical and chemical properties is achieved, including greater mechanical strength and antifungal activity. The fillers analysed include zinc dimethacrylate (ZDMA), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), as well as aluminium oxides, titanium and nanobarium titanate (NBT), which have been shown to enhance the properties of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). In conclusion, filled methacrylate (PMMA) resins have superior advantages compared to unfilled resins, standing out for their greater durability and functionality. However, although clinical evidence and positive patient response support these improvements, further research is needed to refine their application in dental practice.
Downloads
References
Arredondo-Olivares J, Muñoz-Pereira C, Sáez-Torres P. Efectividad de reparaciones de resina utilizando odontología restauradora adhesiva: Una revisión crítica de la literatura. [Tesis de especialidad en línea]. Universidad de Valparaíso Chile; 2022. Available from: https://repositoriobibliotecas.uv.cl/handle/uvscl/6626
Padilla-Avalos C, Marroquín-Soto C. Intermediarios protésicos en implantología oral. Revisión de la literatura. Rev Científica Odontológica. 2021;9(2):e064. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/918
Atria P, Sampaio C, Rosas D, Córdova C, Fernández E, Jorquera G, et al. Factores de riesgo asociados a sensibilidad dental en el tratamiento con prótesis dental fija. Revisión de literatura. Odontoestomatologia. 2019;21(33):62–9.
Kreutz M, Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Lümkemann N, Rizk M. Characterization of methacrylate-based resins containing methacryl-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (MA-POSS-8). Materials (Basel). 2021;14(7):112752. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805511
Zafar MS. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): An update. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(10):2299. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/10/2299
Leão RS, Moraes SLD, Gomes JML, Lemos CAA, Casado BGDS, Vasconcelos BCDE, Pellizzer EP. Influence of addition of zirconia on PMMA: A systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;106:110292. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110292
Elshereksi NW, Muchtar A, Azhari CH. Effects of nanobarium titanate on physical and mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base nanocomposites. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 2021;29(5):484–96. doi:10.1177/0967391120926442
Barapatre D, Somkuwar S, Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. The effects of reinforcement with nanoparticles of polyetheretherketone, zirconium oxide and its mixture on flexural strength of PMMA resin. Eur Oral Res. 2022;56(2):61–6. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eor/issue/70033/904564
Ragheb NA, Borg HS. Antimicrobial effect of titanium oxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in completely edentulous patients: A randomized clinical trial. Adv Dent J. 2021;3(4):173–84. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://adjc.journals.ekb.eg/article_200649.html
Rana MH, Shaik S, Hameed MS, Al-Saleh S, Alhamdan EM, Alshahrani A, et al. Influence of dental glass fibers and orthopedic mesh on the failure loads of polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(16):2793. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/16/2793/htm
Al-Dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Özcan M. A comparison of the surface properties of CAD/CAM and conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthodont. 2019;28(4):452–7. doi:10.1111/jopr.13033
Cierech M, Osica I, Kolenda A, Wojnarowicz J, Szmigiel D, Łojkowski W, et al. Mechanical and physicochemical properties of newly formed ZnO-PMMA nanocomposites for denture bases. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(5):305. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/5/305/htm
Kostić M, Stanojević J, Tačić A, Gligorijević N, Nikolić L, Nikolić V, et al. Determination of residual monomer content in dental acrylic polymers and effect after tissues implantation. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2020;34(1):254–63. doi:10.1080/13102818.2020.1736952
Keul C, Seidl J, Güth JF, Liebermann A. Impact of fabrication procedures on residual monomer elution of conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): A measurement approach by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(12):4519–30. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-020-03317-
Garrofé A, Picca M, Kaplan A. Determination of microhardness of bulk-fill resins at different depths. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022;35(1):10–5. doi:10.54589/aol.35/1/10
Rizzante FAP, Duque JA, Duarte MAH, Mondelli RFL, Mendonça G, Ishikiriama SK. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(3):403–10. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dmj/38/3/38_2018-063/_article
An J, Song Y, Zhao J, Xu B. Antifungal efficiency and cytocompatibility of polymethyl methacrylate modified with zinc dimethacrylate. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1138588. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2023.1138588
Nabhan A, Taha M, Ghazaly NM. Filler loading effect of Al2O3/TiO2 nanoparticles on physical and mechanical characteristics of dental base composite (PMMA). Polym Test. 2023;117:107848. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107848
Zidan S, Silikas N, Haider J, Yates J. Long-term sorption and solubility of zirconia-impregnated PMMA nanocomposite in water and artificial saliva. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(17):3732. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/17/3732/htm
Maluf CV, Da Silva Fidalgo TK, Valente AP, Dos Anjos MJ, Junior RH, De Moraes Telles D. Evaluation of polymethyl methacrylate containing chlorhexidine: A randomized, controlled, split-mouth in situ study. Am J Dent. 2019;32(2):94–8. doi:10.0000/placeholder. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/31094144
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Michelle Anahí Guzmán-Ramos , Flor Nayeli Licuy-Aguinda , Ariel Romero-Fernández (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
