Peer review instruments
Original article
Indicator
Score
Comments
1
2
3
1. Title of the paper
2. Abstract (structure, coherence, complies with the rules)
3. Descriptors according to standards
4. Relevance of the topic
5. Introduction (argumentative rigour)
6. Objective of the article
7. Drafting
8. Method (methodological rigour)
9. Population
10. Measuring instrument
11. Statistical or data analysis
12. Quality of the results presented
13. Argumentative capacity in the discussion
14. Contrasts with theory or authors, highlights research findings.
15. Argumentative ability in the conclusion
16. The work presents new contributions
17. It complies with the editorial standards on references.
Total
Pass = 35 to 51 points
Pass with modifications = 21 to 34 points
Failed = 1 to 20 points
Verdict by reviewer = 1 to 20 points
Comments to the author:
Peer review instrument
Brief original
Clinical communications
Reports and/or case reports
Epidemiological statistics
Indicator
Score
Comments
1
2
3
1. Title of the paper
2. Abstract (structure, coherence, complies with the rules)
3. Descriptors according to standards
4. Relevance of the topic
5. Introduction (argumentative rigour)
6. Objective of the article
7. Drafting
8. Method (methodological rigour)
9. Population
10. Measuring instrument
11. Data analysis
12. Quality of the results presented
13. Argumentative capacity in the discussion
14. Contrasts with theory or authors, highlights research findings.
15. Argumentative ability in the conclusion
16. The work presents new contributions
17. It complies with the editorial standards on references.
Total
Pass = 35 to 51 points
Pass with modifications = 21 to 34 points
Failed = 1 to 20 points
Verdict by reviewer = 1 to 20 points
Comments to the author:
Peer review instrument
Review section
Indicator
Score
Comments
1
2
3
1. Title of the paper
2. Abstract (structure, coherence, complies with the rules)
3. Descriptors according to standards
4. Relevance of the topic
5. Introduction (argumentative rigour)
6. Objective of the article
7. Drafting
8. Argumentative capacity in the reflection
9. Contrasts with theory or authors, highlights research findings.
10. Argumentative ability in conclusion
11. The work presents new contributions
12. Complies with editorial guidelines on references.
Total
Pass = 24 to 36 points
Pass with modifications = 13 to 23 points
Failed = 1 to 12 points
Verdict by reviewer = 1 to 12 points
Comments to the author:
