Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
https://doi.org/10.62574/eqhvwm63
1
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the
Venezuelan reality
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad
venezolana
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
ndcvn1@gmail.com
Universidad Nacional Experimental de la Fuerza Armada, Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7362-5991
ABSTRACT
This article aims to analyse the administration of justice according to algorithmics as seen from the
Venezuelan reality. A legal documentary analytical method was used to develop the article, and the
population analysed consisted of 18 scientific articles. The analysis shows that the administration of
justice in Venezuela faces a structural crisis that requires not only the incorporation of digital
technologies but also a profound ethical and constitutional transformation guided by algorithmics.
Constitutional efficiency and speed must guarantee effective judicial protection without sacrificing
equity or the protection of fundamental rights, which implies that constitutional judges must assume
a leading role as guardians of justice, balancing automation with human judgement.
Descriptors: administration of justice; public administration; civil service. (Source: UNESCO
Thesaurus).
RESUMEN
Este artículo tiene por objetivo analizar la administración de justicia conforme a la algorética vista
desde la realidad venezolana. Para el desarrollo del artículo se empleó un método analítico
documental jurídico, la población analizada estuvo conformada por los 18 artículos científicos. El
análisis evidencia que la administración de justicia en Venezuela enfrenta una crisis estructural que
demanda no solo la incorporación de tecnologías digitales, sino una transformación ética y
constitucional profunda guiada por la algorética. La eficiencia y celeridad constitucional deben
garantizar la tutela judicial efectiva sin sacrificar la equidad ni la protección de derechos
fundamentales, lo que implica que los jueces constitucionales asuman un rol protagónico como
guardianes de la justicia, equilibrando la automatización con el juicio humano.
Descriptores: administración de justicia; administración pública; función pública. (Fuente: Tesauro
UNESCO).
Received: 08/02/2025. Reviewed: 05/03/2025. Approved: 14/04/2025. Published: 01/05/2025.
Research articles section
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
2
INTRODUCTION
In Venezuela, the administration of justice is at a point where the tension between
the urgent need for efficiency and constitutional speed and persistent deficiencies
in the administrative litigation sphere is becoming increasingly evident. Indeed,
Vilera (2009) points out that access to the judiciary is limited by institutional
obstacles that affect the legitimacy and functionality of the system, directly
impacting public confidence and the stability of the rule of law. Likewise, Peña-
Angulo (2015) warns that these deficiencies not only compromise the guarantee of
fundamental rights, but also erode the perception of justice and equity in
Venezuelan society.
On the other hand, efficiency and speed in the administration of justice are
constitutional principles that seek to guarantee effective judicial protection,
understood as the right of every person to obtain a prompt and adequate response
to their legal claims. However, in Venezuelan practice, these principles are hampered
by a series of structural, institutional and social factors that generate administrative
deficiencies that translate into delays, excessive bureaucracy and, on occasion,
denial of justice (Zambrano Noles, 2016). In this regard, Medina-Zepeda (2022)
emphasises that procedural delays and a lack of adequate resources are factors that
hinder effective judicial protection, undermining confidence in the system and the
protection of rights.
Consequently, in this context, the new role of constitutional judges emerges as a
necessary and urgent response to strengthen judicial protection and guarantee
constitutional supremacy. Therefore, Medina-Zepeda (2022) argues that these
judges must take on an active role not only in the interpretation and application of
the Constitution, but also in the transformation of the judicial system, incorporating
new technological tools and ethical principles that will make it possible to overcome
current deficiencies. Likewise, Mera, Vidal & Valencia (2024) argue that the judicial
function must balance the incorporation of automation with the preservation of
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
3
human judgement in order to guarantee efficient justice that respects fundamental
rights.
Thus, this article aims to analyse the administration of justice in accordance with
algorithmics as seen from the Venezuelan reality.
Conceptual framework: Algorithmics and the administration of justice
To address the issue at hand, it is essential to start from a conceptual framework
that allows us to understand the new dynamics that technology introduces into the
administration of justice.
In this sense, algorithmics is presented as an innovative and fundamental concept.
According to Cárdenas-Krenz (2023), algorithmics is ethics applied to algorithms,
especially in contexts where they influence legal and administrative decisions. This
discipline raises the need to design automated systems that respect human rights
and constitutional principles, avoiding bias, discrimination and arbitrariness.
Algorithmic ethics is not limited to the technical programming of algorithms, but
involves a profound reflection on the values and principles that should guide their
design and application. In the judicial sphere, this means that automated systems
must be transparent, explainable and subject to rigorous ethical controls to ensure
that they do not violate fundamental rights or compromise substantive justice.
On the other hand, Bravo-Placeres (2025) provides a complementary view by
highlighting the ‘regulatory dance’ between algorithms and justice, pointing out that
technology must be an instrument at the service of justice, not an end in itself.
Consequently, efficiency and speed must always be subordinate to the protection of
constitutional guarantees and the preservation of human judgement. This
perspective is essential to prevent the digitisation and automation of judicial
processes from leading to a dehumanisation of the system, where speed prevails at
the expense of fairness and justice.
In this sense, algorithmics invites us to consider citizen participation and
transparency as essential elements in the implementation of technologies in justice;
thus, trust in the judicial system depends largely on citizens' understanding and
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
4
acceptance of the technological mechanisms used, and on these mechanisms
responding to clear and democratic ethical principles.
The reality in Venezuela: Shortcomings and challenges in the administration of
justice
The reality of the administration of justice in Venezuela is marked by a series of
structural deficiencies that affect the guarantee of rights and the effectiveness of the
judicial system. In this regard, Vilera (2009) describes a judicial system affected by
slowness, bureaucracy and lack of resources, which limits effective access to justice.
Consequently, this administrative deficiency translates into prolonged delays, a
backlog of cases and a general perception of inefficiency and lack of transparency.
These deficiencies are not merely technical, but are deeply rooted in political, social
and economic factors that condition the functioning of the judicial system. In
addition to the above, the institutional crisis, the lack of judicial independence and
the insufficiency of human and material resources are elements that contribute to
this situation.
In this regard, Peña-Angulo (2015) argues that justice as equity requires a political
regime that promotes transparency and citizen participation, elements that currently
face challenges in Venezuela. It is important to note that the lack of trust in judicial
institutions exacerbates the crisis and demands innovative solutions that not only
improve efficiency but also strengthen the legitimacy and credibility of the system.
Therefore, the deficiency of administrative justice not only affects those subject to
it, but also has a direct impact on governance and democratic stability, while the
perception of impunity and lack of effective access to justice can generate social
discontent and erode the rule of law.
The impact of technology and algorithmics on Venezuelan justice
The incorporation of digital technologies in the administration of justice has been a
global trend that seeks to improve the efficiency and accessibility of the judicial
system. In Venezuela, this trend faces particular challenges due to the structural
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
5
conditions mentioned above, but it also offers opportunities to overcome some of
the existing deficiencies.
In this regard, Medina-Zepeda (2022) argues that digital justice or e-justice can be
a tool for improving procedural efficiency, provided that citizen participation is
guaranteed and constitutional principles are respected. The digitisation of files, the
implementation of judicial management systems and the use of virtual platforms for
hearings are examples of how technology can help streamline processes and reduce
bureaucracy.
However, the simple incorporation of technology does not in itself guarantee the
improvement of the judicial system. These tools must be designed and applied
under clear ethical criteria that take into account the social and cultural diversity of
the country and avoid the exclusion of vulnerable sectors that may have difficulties
accessing digital media.
In this regard, algorithmics becomes an indispensable framework for guiding
technological implementation in the Venezuelan justice system. Villalba (2020)
emphasises that ethics in artificial intelligence must be a central component to
prevent algorithms from reproducing or amplifying existing inequalities and
discrimination.
New role of constitutional judges as guardians of efficiency and justice
In view of the shortcomings of administrative justice and the growing incorporation
of technologies, constitutional judges in Venezuela have taken on a renewed and
leading role. Their function transcends the mere interpretation of the Constitution
to become agents of change who must guarantee constitutional supremacy and the
effective protection of rights.
In this regard, Medina-Zepeda (2022) argues that constitutional judges must lead
the transformation towards a digital justice system that is efficient, transparent and
participatory. This implies not only validating the constitutionality of rules and
procedures, but also supervising the implementation of technologies and ensuring
that they respect fundamental rights. In response to this, Mera, Vidal & Valencia
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
6
(2024) warn that, although automation can support the judicial function, it should
not replace human judgement, which is essential to guarantee fairness and
substantive justice. Constitutional judges must therefore balance the incorporation
of technology with the defence of fundamental rights, ensuring that procedural
efficiency does not translate into mechanical or depersonalised justice, as this new
role also implies greater responsibility in the training and updating of judicial
operators, as well as in the promotion of a judicial culture that values ethics,
transparency and citizen participation.
METHOD
A legal documentary analysis method was used to develop this article, aimed at
examining and understanding the issue of constitutional efficiency and speed in the
face of administrative litigation deficiencies in Venezuela, as well as the new role of
constitutional judges in this context.
The population analysed consisted of the 18 scientific articles cited in this paper,
selected for their relevance and conceptual contribution to the topic. These
documents include specialised studies on the administration of justice, algorithmics,
Venezuelan constitutional law and the incorporation of technologies in the judicial
sphere.
The documentary analysis consisted of a critical and systematic review of these texts
in order to identify the main structural and procedural deficiencies affecting the
administration of justice in Venezuela, as well as the proposals and debates
surrounding the ethics of algorithms and the role of constitutional judges. The
regulatory frameworks, doctrines and emerging technological trends reflected in
these articles were examined.
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
7
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
It is important to bear in mind that algorithmic ethics provides an essential ethical
framework for the administration of justice in Venezuela. In this regard, Cárdenas-
Krenz (2023) points out that algorithmic ethics must guide the implementation of
technologies to prevent efficiency from becoming a pretext for exclusion or
arbitrariness. In this sense, algorithmics not only regulates the technical functioning
of automated systems, but also establishes principles to protect human dignity and
fundamental rights. Table 1 shows the contributions of authors on the importance
of algorithmics:
Table 1.
Administration of justice according to algorithmics in Venezuela
Author(s)
Year
Focus on justice and
technological ethics
in Latin America and
Venezuela
Main contribution
Importance for
justice and ethics in
Venezuela
Domingo-
Moratalla
2024
Combines technology
and human values in
justice
Proposes that
technology should
advance without losing
sight of respect and care
for people.
Reinforces that digital
justice must be
humane and ethical.
Francisco
2024
Ethics and
responsibility in the use
of new technologies
Points out that
technology use must be
guided by clear and
responsible ethical
principles.
Highlights the need for
ethics in the digital
transformation of
justice.
Ospina-
Hernández
2024
Training and ethics in
the use of digital tools
Emphasizes the
importance of preparing
justice workers to
properly use technology.
Supports ethical
training for judges and
officials in technology
use.
Paglia
2021
Ethical impact of
technology on society
and justice
Explains that technology
must be used justly,
avoiding biases and
inequalities.
Grounds the need to
safeguard equity in
digital justice.
Sacoto-Romo &
Cordero-
Moscoso
2021
Inclusion and access to
justice through
technology
Show how technology
can help more people
access justice.
Provide useful
examples to improve
digital justice in
Venezuela.
Segura
2023
Challenges and risks of
technology in Latin
American justice
Warns about the dangers
of using technology
without considering
social and ethical
context.
Calls for careful
regulation of
technology in
Venezuelan justice.
Selma-Penalva
2021
Ethics and regulation in
the use of technology in
law
Discusses the
importance of clear rules
Offers ideas to create
ethical standards for
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
8
for the fair use of
technology in justice.
digital justice in
Venezuela.
Severini
2021
Ethics in digital
transformation
Reflects on the need to
maintain ethical values in
the modernization of
justice.
Reinforces that
technology should not
replace human justice.
Soledad-
Paladino
2025
Ethical and human
perspective on
technology applied to
justice
Invites consideration of
the human and spiritual
dimension in technology
use.
Complements
technological ethics
with a more human
and close vision.
Suárez-
Manrique, De-
León-Vargas &
Monsalve-Pinto
2023
Experiences and
challenges in the use of
technology in
Colombian justice
Analyze how technology
has been applied in
Colombia and lessons for
Venezuela.
Provide a framework
to apply technology
ethically in
Venezuelan justice.
Source: Prepared internally.
On the other hand, the Venezuelan experience reveals that administrative litigation
deficiencies are not only a technical problem, but also a political and social one. In
view of this, Vilera (2009) considers that the slowness of the judiciary affects public
confidence and limits access to justice, which requires a comprehensive response
that includes institutional and technological reforms. Therefore, the solution cannot
be limited to digitisation, but must address the structural causes of inefficiency, such
as lack of judicial independence, corruption and insufficient resources.
In this sense, constitutional speed must be interpreted as a mandate to guarantee
effective judicial protection, without sacrificing the quality of legal analysis or the
protection of rights. In this regard, Medina-Zepeda (2022) warns that digital justice
can improve efficiency, but requires ethical and participatory design to avoid
dehumanisation, while citizen participation and transparency are key elements in
legitimising digital justice and strengthening trust in the system.
On the other hand, automation, although promising, cannot replace the human role
of the judge. In view of this, Mera, Vidal & Valencia (2024) argue that human
judgement is irreplaceable in guaranteeing equity and substantive justice, aspects
that algorithms cannot yet fully replicate. Constitutional judges must therefore take
an active role in supervising and regulating technology, ensuring that it
complements rather than replaces the judicial function.
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
9
CONCLUSION
The analysis shows that the administration of justice in Venezuela faces a structural
crisis that requires not only the incorporation of digital technologies, but also a
profound ethical and constitutional transformation guided by algorithmics.
Constitutional efficiency and speed must guarantee effective judicial protection
without sacrificing fairness or the protection of fundamental rights, which means
that constitutional judges must assume a leading role as guardians of justice,
balancing automation with human judgement. Only through the responsible,
transparent, and participatory integration of technology, backed by clear ethical
principles and institutional reforms, will it be possible to overcome administrative
litigation deficiencies and restore public confidence in the Venezuelan judicial
system.
FINANCING
Non-monetary
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There is no conflict of interest with individuals or institutions linked to the research.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
To those who promote justice with ethics and equity in the use of technological
advances.
REFERENCES
Bravo-Placeres, I. (2025). Entre algoritmos y justicia: la danza regulatoria de la inteligencia artificial
[Between algorithms and justice: The regulatory dance of artificial intelligence].
Iustitia
Socialis. Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Criminalísticas, 10
(18), 5-25.
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v10i18.4338
Cárdenas-Krenz, R. (2023). Algorética: la ética del algoritmo [Algorhythmic ethics: The ethics of the
algorithm].
Revista Peruana de Derecho Constitucional: Revista Oficial del Tribunal
Constitucional, 16
, 39-50.
Domingo-Moratalla, A. (2024). Cuidado integral y aceleración tecnológica [Comprehensive care and
technological acceleration].
Scio, (26)
, 19-31.
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 4(2), 1-10, 2025
Administración de justicia conforme a la algorética: Vista desde la realidad venezolana
Administration of justice according to algorithmics: A view from the Venezuelan reality
Noemí del Carmen Navarro-Villarroel
10
Francisco, P. (2024). Discurso del Santo Padre Francisco al Foro Intergubernamental del G7 (Apulia-
Italia) [Speech of His Holiness Pope Francis at the G7 Intergovernmental Forum (Apulia-
Italy)].
Biblia, Teología y Pastoral para América Latina y El Caribe, 50
(189), 433-443.
Medina-Zepeda, E. (2022). Hacia una teoría sobre la e-justice o justicia digital: instrucciones para
armar [Towards a theory on e-justice or digital justice: Instructions to assemble].
Cuestiones
constitucionales, (46)
, 177-212. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2022.46.17052
Mera, J. C. V., Vidal, T. M., & Valencia, Y. D. V. (2024). Automatización de la justicia: ¿Puede un
algoritmo reemplazar a un juez? [Automation of justice: Can an algorithm replace a judge?].
Revista San Gregorio, 1
(60), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i60.3222
Ospina-Hernández, C. A. (2024). La virtualidad en el magisterio del papa Francisco [Virtuality in the
magisterium of Pope Francis]. En D. Santa Cruz Vera (Comp.),
Enseñanza de las humanidades
en la universidad: propuestas pedagógicas y didácticas
(pp. 209-224). Editorial Universidad
Católica de Colombia. https://doi.org/10.14718/9786287554788.2024.10
Paglia, V. (2021). Tecnologie digitali ed etica [Digital technologies and ethics].
Rivista di Scienze
dell'Educazione, 59
(1), 68-80.
Peña-Angulo, J. (2015). La justicia como equidad, el régimen político y las morales del siglo XXI en
Venezuela y Estados Unidos [Justice as fairness, the political regime, and 21st-century
morals in Venezuela and the United States].
Tiempo y Espacio, 25
(63), 187-209.
Sacoto-Romo, M. C., & Cordero-Moscoso, J. M. (2021). E-justicia en Ecuador: inclusión de las TIC en
la administración de justicia [E-justice in Ecuador: Inclusion of ICT in the administration of
justice].
Foro: Revista de Derecho, (36)
, 91-110.
https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2021.36.5
Segura, R. E. (2023). Inteligencia artificial y administración de justicia: desafíos derivados del
contexto latinoamericano [Artificial intelligence and administration of justice: Challenges
arising from the Latin American context].
Revista de Bioética y Derecho, (58)
, 45-72.
https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2023.58.40601
Selma-Penalva, A. (2021). Inteligencia artificial y Derecho del Trabajo [Artificial intelligence and labor
law].
IUS ET SCIENTIA, 7
(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2021.i02.03
Severini, M. (2021). Etica [Ethics].
Piccolo dizionario della grande trasformazione digitale
(I volti di
Clio; 13), 37-43.
Soledad-Paladino, M. (2025). Teología de la tecnología [Theology of technology].
Scripta Theologica,
57
(1).
Suárez-Manrique, W. Y., De-León-Vargas, G. I., & Monsalve-Pinto, J. J. (2023). Un análisis sobre la
aplicabilidad de la inteligencia artificial en el derecho colombiano [An analysis on the
applicability of artificial intelligence in Colombian law].
Prolegómenos, 26
(52), 11-23.
https://doi.org/10.18359/prole.5625
Vilera, M. (2009). El acceso a la función judicial en Venezuela [Access to the judicial function in
Venezuela].
Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 15
(1), 13-36.
Villalba, J. F. (2020). Algorética: la ética en la inteligencia artificial [Algorhythmic ethics: Ethics in
artificial intelligence].
Anales de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales de la Universidad
Nacional de La Plata, 17
(50), 062. https://doi.org/10.24215/25916386e062
Zambrano Noles, S. (2016). El acceso a la justicia y la tutela judicial efectiva en relación con la
seguridad ciudadana en Ecuador [Access to justice and effective judicial protection in
relation to citizen security in Ecuador].
Tla-melaua, 9
(39), 58-78.
Copyright: 2025 By the authors. This article is open access and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
